Management and Exclusionary Discipline Strategies †Free Samples

Question: Discuss about the Management and Exclusionary Discipline Strategies. Answer: Introduction Cry problems, postnatal depression and the infant sleep and are the affect the metal health of the concerned parents. Several studies conducted reveal that crying problems and infant sleep are a common phenomenon that occur within the first few months of the infants (Cook et al., 2012). These problems are associated with depression among the new mothers, premature weaning. Infant crying is considered a risk factor for head trauma. Along with the crying problems, the sleep problems among the infants are the common problems which forces the parents to seek help from the healthcare professionals. While to address these only a few work has been done in this field. Hence, this study is aimed towards evaluation of a prevention plan that aims to prohibit the cry and sleep complications among the infants and also focusses on the issue of postnatal depression. Yes, the trial addressed a clearly focused issue. A randomized control trial was performed on 781 infants who are born at 32 weeks in 42 well child centers which is located in Melbourne, Australia. Infant aged 4 and 6 months were followed up. Intervention included the supply of instruction about cry patterns, infant sleep, settling techniques, parent self-care, causes of crying among the infants, these are dispatched by DVD and booklets (at the 4 weeks infant age), telephonic consultation (during the 8 weeks) and group that includes the parents (at 13 weeks) in contrast to well-child care. The outcomes revealed the infant night sleep problems by the caregiver group, daytime sleep in infants, feeding and cry problems, sleep and cry period, symptoms of depression among the caregivers, night waking and attendance and change of formula (Hiscock et al., 2014). Yes, the assignment of the infants to treatments were randomized. The research team emailed baseline questionnaire to the interested families, information statement for the participants and consent forms. After the forms were received, around 1957 families were invited to take part in the selection procedure, among these 770 were found to be eligible and they were recruited. Finally, a total of 781 infants which also included twins. The families were randomly placed in the intervention group and control group. The intervention group had 385 families with 388 infants and the control group had 385 families with 393 infants. This whole procedure of segregating the infants was done by an independent statistician and a computer which generated random numbers. The families and research team remained concealed till the allocation of groups and even during the time of recruitment and consent. Beyond this level the concealment was not feasible depending on the intervention type (Jrvinen et al ., 2014). The trial did not stop early while after the 4 month and 6 month follow up respectively, the intervention was discontinued because the families did not return the questionnaire, were too busy with their work and were no longer interested in the intervention. After, the 4-month follow-up the intervention group, the intervention was discontinued on the 8 infants from 8 families. The same occurred after the 6-month follow-up in which intervention were discontinued for the intervention group counting 1 infant from 1 family. The control group also shared the similar discontinuations. After 4-month follow-up intervention were discontinued for the 6 infants from 6 families. And after 6-month follow-up intervention was discontinued for the 2 infants from 2 families. Yes, all the patients that were assigned to the respective randomized groups were analyzed (Neff Germer, 2013). No, the health workers, patients and the researchers were not blind to the treatment. Although, the outcomes may be biased due to the lack of blinding of the intervention, but the absence of any group differences in the outcome of the infants depicts that no biasness had occurred. According to the results, comparing with the adults that reside in state of Victoria, the caregivers were better educated and there is higher chance that they will speak English at their residence. Hence the results do not generalize with the less educated and the non-educated parents that speak English. Yes, the groups were identical at the beginning of the trial. Around 1957 families were invited to take part in the selection procedure, among these 770 were found to be eligible and they were recruited. Finally, a total of 781 infants which included twins. The families were randomly placed in the intervention group and control group. Then the final 770 families were segregated in to two separate groups: intervention group and controlled group each having 385 families with 388 and 393 infants respectively. According to the analysis, it was found that the participating families were comparatively belonging from a higher socio-economic status than the non-participating families. Majority of the primary care givers were mothers aged around 33, with the average infant age of around 4 weeks. Apart from the primary caregivers that speak English as a first language, the control families did not differ demographically from the intervention groups (Hiscock et al., 2014). Apart from the examination intervention, both the groups were treated uniformly. In order to reduce the biased data to percolate into the results, the groups were treated equally. The population selection and segregation were done in a concealed way and randomized way. This whole procedure of segregating the infants was done by an independent statistician and a computer which generated random numbers. Hence, this justifies that groups were treated equally other than the differences in the experimental intervention (Mitchell Bradshaw, 2013). The outcomes that were measured include the infant outcomes at the 4 and 6 months, caregiver outcomes at the 4 and 6 months. Yes, the primary outcome is clearly specified. The outcome is caregiver reported which includes the infant night sleep problem (Hiscock et al., 2014). The results found in the infant outcome at the 4 and 6 months are as follows: No changes were found in the caregiver report from both the groups including the intervention group and the control group. which depicts that infant crying, sleeping and the feeding problems were same in both the groups. The condition arm was differentially affected for those infants that were classified as frequent feeder at the 4 months but not in 6 months. The infants in both the groups, who were frequently fed showed 87% higher chances of sleep problems during daytime and 73% higher chance of experiencing the problems of crying. Sleep problems during the night time showed similar results in both the groups. The comparison between the first born and the later born revealed no differences in the sleeping and the crying patterns. The results of the caregiver outcomes at the 4 and 6 months are as follows: The caregiver outcomes also depicted that the both groups had the similar depression symptoms at the 4 months. However, at the 6 months, the caregivers of the intervention group reported that it scored less than 9 in comparison with the control group on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Within the 4 and 6 months, the intervention caregiver reported a less score on the EPDS in comparison to the control caregivers. Intervention caregivers also had less ambiguity about managing the sleep of infants. At the 4 months the intervention caregivers asked for more help than the caregivers of control group. While at 6 months there was no difference. Judging by the confidence interval is between 0.03 to 0.54 which depicts a confidence limit of 95%. Thus, the estimation of the treatment effect is deemed to be precise (Samuels, Witmer Schaffner, 2012). No, I do not think that the infants and the families that the trial covered are identical enough to the other patients to whom I will apply, because this study effectively removed the families who were socio-economically poor and less educated and excluded the families that do not speak English as the first language. Hence, if I am to study a population that is socio-economically different from the families selected in this particular study, then this study will fail to a considerable extent (Mitchell Bradshaw, 2013). The paper clearly states about the problems in the crying and the sleep patterns among the frequent feeders, the paper is restricted to the issues of the frequent feeders while the problems experience by the infrequent feeders is not addressed in this research study. Although the outcomes are suitable in the broad perspective, but it loses the traction when infrequent feeders are taken into account (Lapillonne Griffin, 2013). The study is relatively based and designed to address the issues that arise due to frequent feeding, like the infant sleep problems and the cry problems. The study is broadly a community based and a randomized controlled trial which selects a sample size of 781 infants and emphasizes on the infant outcomes and caregiver outcomes at the 4 and 6 months. The sample size of 781 infants is segregated in to two groups containing a controlled group and an intervention group. An important finding is that parents consider infant crying as a normal phenomenon and do not report it as a problem, the study even tried to address the issue but it was unsuccessful which depicts that more than education is required to solve the problem. It is found that the caregivers accrued moderate benefits, a greater amount of reduction in the symptoms of depression between the 4 and 6 month and lesser incidence of the manifestations at the 6 months. Educating the caregivers provided them with ample amount of knowledge which helps to identify the reasons behind the infant sleep disorders (Angelo, Egan Reid, 2013). This very knowledge helped the caregivers to have a better mental health. Thus, it can be said that the benefits are worth the harms and costs. PICOT Analysis According to Riva et al. (2012), the PICOT analysis of the study reveals the following: Population/ Patient problem- A randomized control trial was performed on 781 infants who are born at 32 weeks in 42 well child centers which is located in Melbourne, Australia. Infant aged 4 and 6 months were followed up. Intervention- Intervention included the supply of instruction about cry patterns, infant sleep, settling techniques, parent self-care, causes of crying among the infants, these are dispatched by DVD and booklets (at the 4 weeks infant age), telephonic consultation (during the 8 weeks) and group that includes the parents (at 13 weeks) in contrast to well-child care. Comparison- The families were randomly placed into intervention group and control group. The intervention group included 385 families containing 388 infants and the control group included 385 families containing 393 infants. Here, the control group served as a control population or the comparison group. Outcome- The outcomes revealed the infant night sleep problems by the caregiver group, daytime sleep in infants, feeding and cry problems, sleep and cry period, symptoms of depression among the caregivers, night waking and attendance and change of formula Time- the duration of the whole study was a 16 month. It took part between 1st March 2010 to 1st June 2011. Analysis of primary results The magnitude of the intervention effect can be summarized as caregivers accrued moderate benefits, a greater amount of contraction in the depression symptoms among the 4 and 6 month and fewer incidence of the manifestation at the 6 months. Educating the caregivers provided them with sufficient amount of knowledge which helps them to identify the reasons behind the infant sleep disorders. This very knowledge helped the caregivers to have a better mental health. The precision of the intervention effect is based on the confidence interval which is between 0.03 to 0.54, that depicts a confidence limit of 95%. Hence, when infants are frequently fed, there is 87% more probability of experiencing the sleep issues during daytime. And 73% more probability of experiencing the problems related to crying in the infants. Both the observations have a 95% confidence interval which depicts that the results are applicable to the wider population. While considering the results of caregiver outcomes at the 4 and 6 months, at the 6 months, the intervention caregivers scored less than the 9, with a confidence interval of 95% which depicts its applicability with the wider population. And also between the 4 and 6 months the depression levels among the caregivers reduced and they scored less than 9 on the EPDS compared to the control caregivers (Samuels, Witmer Schaffner, 2012). Statistically, the data reveals a positive outcome among the caregivers in the intervention group. These positive outcomes are applicable to the wider population that are experiencing sleep and cry problems. While the data and findings loses its validity and impact when the infants are frequently fed. When the infants are frequently fed, the incidence of the sleep and cry problems increase among them. Clinical Scenario Around 1957 families were invited to take part in the selection procedure, among these 770 were found to be eligible and they were recruited. Finally, a total of 781 infants which included twins. The families were randomly placed in to intervention group and control group. Then the final 770 families were segregated in to two separate groups: intervention group and controlled group each having 385 families with 388 and 393 infants respectively. The study was conducted in Australia focusing on the educated families that have a well socio-economic status. Benefits that are accrued from the study are depicted clearly in the results (Powell et al., 2014). While the study itself devoid of any harms, it had costs attached with it during its conduct. The cost of training the health professionals, family, conduction of a parent group session, the distribution of the intervention materials and other overhead costs. Thus results depict that they are applicable to a clinical scenario because th e intervention group showed positive outcomes compared to the control group. The outcomes favored the caregivers that are provided with the appropriate training and resources. Conclusion Therefor to conclude from the above disclosure, the study throws light into the issue that was not well researched. It reveals a positive outcome that are beneficial for the caregivers when provided with the appropriate training and knowledge. While, the study is not applicable for the infants that are frequently fed, a lot of works remains to be done for the caregivers that lacked education and knowledge of nurturing and caring the infants. References Angelo, J. K., Egan, R., Reid, K. (2013). Essential knowledge for family caregivers.International journal of palliative nursing,19(8), 383-88. Cook, F., Bayer, J., Le, H. N., Mensah, F., Cann, W., Hiscock, H. (2012). Baby Business: a randomised controlled trial of a universal parenting program that aims to prevent early infant sleep and cry problems and associated parental depression.BMC pediatrics,12(1), 13. Hiscock, H., Cook, F., Bayer, J., Le, H. N., Mensah, F., Cann, W., ... St James-Roberts, I. (2014). Preventing early infant sleep and crying problems and postnatal depression: a randomized trial.Pediatrics,133(2), e346-e354. Jrvinen, T. L., Sihvonen, R., Bhandari, M., Sprague, S., Malmivaara, A., Paavola, M., ... Guyatt, G. H. (2014). Blinded interpretation of study results can feasibly and effectively diminish interpretation bias.Journal of clinical epidemiology,67(7), 769-772. Lapillonne, A., Griffin, I. J. (2013). Feeding preterm infants today for later metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes.The Journal of pediatrics,162(3), S7-S16. Mitchell, M. M., Bradshaw, C. P. (2013). Examining classroom influences on student perceptions of school climate: The role of classroom management and exclusionary discipline strategies.Journal of School Psychology,51(5), 599-610. Neff, K. D., Germer, C. K. (2013). A pilot study and randomized controlled trial of the mindful self?compassion program.Journal of clinical psychology,69(1), 28-44. Powell-Jackson, T., Hanson, K., Whitty, C. J., Ansah, E. K. (2014). Who benefits from free healthcare? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Ghana.Journal of Development Economics,107, 305-319. Riva, J. J., Malik, K. M., Burnie, S. J., Endicott, A. R., Busse, J. W. (2012). What is your research question? An introduction to the PICOT format for clinicians.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association,56(3), 167. Samuels, M. L., Witmer, J. A., Schaffner, A. (2012).Statistics for the life sciences. Pearson education.